SUMMARY

Long-acting reversible contraceptive methods, including the contraceptive implant and intrauterine devices, are highly effective and cost-effective options for women who have no specific contraindications. Long-acting reversible contraceptives are more effective at reducing unintended pregnancy than short-acting contraceptives.

Short-acting contraceptive methods consist of combined hormonal contraception (e.g. the combined oral contraceptive pill, vaginal ring), progestogen-only pills, and the progestogen-containing contraceptive injection.

Choice of contraception is based on factors such as medical eligibility (i.e. precautions, contraindications), patient preference and reproductive life stage.

Counselling patients on the benefits and risks of all contraceptive methods is important for informed decision-making. Regular contraceptive review can allow for patient education and monitoring of adverse effects.

 

Introduction

It is estimated that around two-thirds of Australian women of childbearing age currently use a form of contraception.1,2 The combined oral contraceptive pill is the most commonly used method, followed by condoms.1,2

Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) include the contraceptive implant and intrauterine devices (IUDs) and are the most effective methods of contraception. The short-acting hormonal forms of contraception (e.g. combined oral contraceptive pill, progestogen-only pill, contraceptive injection, vaginal ring) are more user-dependent methods and their failure rates with typical (real-world) use are higher than LARCs.

The uptake of LARCs in Australia has slowly increased over the past decade. In 2018, it was estimated around 10.8% of women aged 15 to 44 years were using a LARC, with 4.5% using the contraceptive implant and 6.3% using an IUD.3 However, the proportion of women using LARCs in Australia is lower than in other countries of comparable development status;4 for example, in Sweden, a 2017 report found 30.9% of women were using a LARC.5

The reliance on less effective methods of contraception is reflected in the unintended pregnancy rate across Australia, estimated to be around 40%, and higher among women in rural areas.6 Around 30% of unintended pregnancies end in abortion,7 and continuing unintended pregnancies are associated with poorer maternal and child outcomes.8 Increased LARC uptake results in a lower rate of unintended pregnancies and abortions, reducing the associated risks.9 The high effectiveness of LARCs in preventing unintended pregnancy makes them the most cost-effective forms of reversible contraception.10,11

Providing education around the range of contraceptive options, as well as removing barriers to access, is key to improving reproductive autonomy. There is good evidence that when barriers such as access and cost are removed, and the contraceptive and non-contraceptive effects of LARCs are explained, women are more likely to choose LARCs.9,10

This article provides an update on long- and short-acting contraceptive methods in Australia. The article also discusses the factors influencing choice of contraception, management of adverse effects, contraceptive considerations for different population groups, and means to increase contraceptive accessibility. Clinicians should be aware of barrier, permanent and other nonpharmacological forms of contraception, as well as emergency contraception, which are not discussed in this article.

This article focuses on contraceptive advice relevant for people with a uterus. While the word ‘women’ is occasionally used, the authors recognise that this information may be relevant to people with a range of gender identities.

 

Long-acting reversible contraceptive methods

In Australia, the following LARCs are available (Table 1):

  • hormonal contraceptive implant
  • hormonal IUDs (52 mg or 19.5 mg levonorgestrel)
  • copper IUDs (umbrella or T-shaped).

Table 1 Long-acting reversible contraceptive methods available in Australia11-15

Contraceptive implant Hormonal intrauterine devices Copper intrauterine devices

Brand example

Implanon NXT

Mirena

Kyleena

TT380

TT380 short

Load 375

CU375

CU380

Hormone dose

68 mg etonogestrel

52 mg levonorgestrel

19.5 mg levonorgestrel

Mechanism of action

Thickens cervical mucus

Inhibits ovulation

Possibly thins endometrium

Thickens cervical mucus

Causes endometrial atrophy

Affects sperm and oocyte motility

Occasionally prevents ovulation

Is toxic to sperm

Has an endometrial effect

Duration

3 years

8 years for contraception (except when inserted for contraception in women aged 45 years and older, in which case it can remain in situ until age 55)

5 years for endometrial protection with estrogen-containing menopausal hormone therapy

5 years

5 to 10 years (depending on device)

Efficacy

99.9%

99.9%

99.7%

99.2%

Effect on bleeding

Variable bleeding patterns

Reduction in bleeding

Users may experience amenorrhoea or infrequent light bleeding

Users may experience irregular bleeding

Can increase menstrual bleeding and pain

Other benefits

Periods may be less painful

Management of dysmenorrhoea and heavy menstrual bleeding

Endometrial protection for users of estrogen-containing menopausal hormone therapy

Slightly smaller device frame compared with Mirena [NB1]; may offer easier insertion for young and nulliparous women16

Can be used as emergency contraception if inserted within 5 days of unprotected intercourse

PBS subsidy

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

PBS = Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (Australia) NB1: Size of Kyleena: 28 × 30 mm frame; 3.8 mm inserter tube diameter; has a silver ring at neck. Size of Mirena: 32 × 32 mm frame; 4.4 mm inserter tube diameter; no silver ring at neck.

In 2024, the approved duration of use for the 52 mg levonorgestrel IUD (Mirena) was extended from 5 to 8 years for the purpose of contraception in Australia.17 This change was based on data from a large US-based study that found the contraceptive efficacy of the Mirena IUD at 8 years was comparable with its efficacy at 5 years.18 The Mirena is approved for managing heavy menstrual bleeding for 5 years; however, if heavy menstrual bleeding has not returned, continuation up to 8 years may be considered.19 Extended use, beyond 5 years, of the 19.5 mg levonorgestrel IUD (Kyleena) is not recommended.

 

Short-acting contraceptive methods

Short-acting contraceptive methods in Australia include (Table 2):

  • the combined oral contraceptive pill
  • vaginal ring
  • progestogen-only pill
  • contraceptive injection.

Table 2 Short-acting contraceptive methods available in Australia

Combined hormonal contraception Progestogen-only methods
Combined oral contraceptive pill Vaginal ring Progestogen-only pill20 Contraceptive injection (depot medroxyprogesterone)13,21

Brand example

See Table 3

NuvaRing

Noriday

Microlut

Slinda

Depo-Provera

Hormone dose

See Table 3

11.7 mg etonogestrel and 2.7 mg ethinylestradiol

(120 micrograms etonogestrel and 15 micrograms ethinylestradiol daily)

Noriday: 350 micrograms norethisterone

Microlut: 30 micrograms levonorgestrel

Slinda: 4 mg drospirenone

150 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate

Mechanism of action

Inhibits ovulation

Changes cervical mucus

Thickens cervical mucus

Inhibits ovulation (drospirenone only)

Inhibits ovulation

Changes cervical mucus to limit sperm penetration

Causes endometrial changes unfavourable for implantation

Dosing schedule

Daily

Placed in vagina for 3 weeks. Ring then removed, and a new ring inserted with an optional 7 day hormone break

Daily

Administered every 12 weeks

If adminstered within 14 weeks of last injection, no additional contraception needed

Efficacy13,22

99.5% with perfect use

93% with typical use

99.5% with perfect use

93% with typical use

99.5% with perfect use

91% with typical use

99.8% with perfect use

96% with typical use

Effect on bleeding

Typically reduced menstrual bleeding

Variable

Some patients may experience initial irregular bleeding; majority of users become amenorrhoeic over time

Non-contraceptive benefits

Reduced menstrual bleeding and pain

May improve acne and hirsutism

Reduced endometriosis recurrence after surgical management

Reduced risk of some cancers

Limited evidence; however, some suggestion that drospirenone may reduce dysmennorhoea, acne and hirsutism20

Amenorrhoea or reduced bleeding; may benefit those with heavy menstrual bleeding or endometriosis

Discrete

PBS subsidy

See Table 3

No

Yes (all)

Yes

PBS = Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (Australia)

Combined oral contraceptive pills

There are many combined oral contraceptive pills available in Australia (Table 3). The efficacies of all the preparations are considered equal. A newer combined oral contraceptive pill became available in Australia in 2022 (Nextstellis). It contains drospirenone, as the progestogen component, and estetrol, a newly created hormone compound that aims to match a form of naturally occurring estrogen. This combination offers the benefit of a low rate of unscheduled bleeding.23 Further, estetrol appears to have a minimal impact on haemostasis compared with other available estrogen preparations.23

Table 3 Combined oral contraceptive pills available in Australia24

Brand name Estrogen Progestogen PBS listing

Femme-Tab ED 20/100

Loette

Microgynon 20 ED

Micronelle 20 ED

20 micrograms ethinylestradiol

100 micrograms levonorgestrel

Only Femme-Tab ED 20/100 listed on PBS

Eleanor 150/30 ED

Evelyn 150/30 ED

Femme-Tab ED 30/150

Lenest 30 ED

Leveth 150/30 ED

Levlen ED

Microgynon 30 ED

Micronelle 30 ED

Monofeme

Seasonique

30 micrograms ethinylestradiol

150 micrograms levonorgestrel

All are listed on the PBS
except Microgynon 30 ED, Monofeme and Seasonique

Microgynon 50 ED

50 micrograms ethinylestradiol

125 micrograms levonorgestrel

Yes

Logynon ED

Trifeme 28

Triquilar ED

6 × 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol

6 × 50 micrograms levonorgestrel

All are listed on the PBS

5 × 40 micrograms ethinylestradiol

5 × 75 micrograms levonorgestrel

10 × 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol

10 × 125 micrograms levonorgestrel

Norimin 28 Day

35 micrograms ethinylestradiol

500 micrograms norethisterone

Yes

Norimin-1 28 Day

35 micrograms ethinylestradiol

1000 micrograms norethisterone

Yes

Madeline

Marvelon 28

30 micrograms ethinylestradiol

150 micrograms desogestrel

No

Minulet

30 micrograms ethinylestradiol

75 micrograms gestodene

No

Brenda-35 ED

Diane-35 ED

Estelle-35 ED

Jene-35 ED

Juliet-35 ED

35 micrograms ethinylestradiol

2 mg cyproterone acetate

No

Bella

Brooke

Rosie

Yana

Yaz

20 micrograms ethinylestradiol

3 mg drospirenone

Yaz only

Brooklynn

Isabelle

Petibelle

Rosalee

Yasmin

Yelena

30 micrograms ethinylestradiol

3 mg drospirenone

Yasmin only

Valette

30 micrograms ethinylestradiol

2 mg dienogest

No

Qlaira

2 × 3 mg estradiol valerate

No

5 × 2 mg estradiol valerate

5 × 2 mg dienogest

17 × 2 mg estradiol valerate

17 × 3 mg dienogest

2 × 1 mg estradiol valerate

Zoely

1.5 mg estradiol

2.5 mg nomegestrol acetate

No

Nextstellis

14.2 mg estetrol

3 mg drospirenone

No

PBS = Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (Australia)

Vaginal ring

The vaginal ring is another form of combined hormonal contraception, having a similar mechanism, contraindications and precautions to the combined oral contraceptive pill (Table 2). The vaginal ring is not affected by gastrointestinal absorption and may benefit women with malabsorptive disorders who wish to use an estrogen-containing regimen.

Progestogen-only pills

There are 2 types of progestogen-only pills available in Australia (Table 2). ‘Traditional’ progestogen-only pills contain norethisterone (Noriday) or levonorgestrel (Microlut). Doses of these are considered ‘missed’ if they are taken more than 3 hours late.13

The second type of progestogen-only pill contains drospirenone (Slinda) which has been available in Australia since 2021. It differs from traditional progestogen-only pills in that it additionally prevents ovulation and has a 24-hour ‘missed pill’ window.13 The pill packs contain 24 active pills and 4 inactive pills, offering the potential for more predictable, scheduled bleeding patterns compared with traditional progestogen-only pills.25

Contraceptive injection

A contraceptive injection that is available in Australia is depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), a long-acting progestogen that is administered via intramuscular injection in either the gluteal site (preferred) or the deltoid muscle (Table 2). DMPA is associated with a small loss in bone density in users; however, this is thought to recover upon cessation.26 For women with additional risk factors for osteoporosis or younger women who have not reached their peak bone density, an alternative form of contraception may be more suitable. Prior to commencing DMPA, patients should be advised there may be a delay in return to fertility of up to 12 months,13,27 and those desiring pregnancy sooner, or women in the later stages of their fertility window, should consider an alternative contraceptive. Overseas, a contraceptive injection that may be patient-administered subcutaneously is available.

 

Factors influencing choice of contraception

Many factors influence the choice of contraception, such as:28

  • clinical history including reproductive history
  • medical eligibility, including contraindications and precautions
  • reproductive stage of life
  • potential for drug interactions
  • reversibility
  • lifestyle.

General principles to consider when choosing contraception are in Box 1. The UK Medical Eligibility Criteria (UKMEC) provides comprehensive guidance on which contraceptive methods can be safely used, and when caution or contraindication is relevant to specific medical conditions, reproductive history, and clinical characteristics such as cardiovascular risk.29 The online UKMEC calculator is a helpful tool for clinicians when selecting a contraceptive method.

Box 1 General principles to consider when choosing contraception

All patients should be offered education on the range of contraceptive options and select the most suitable contraception for them, in line with their medical eligibility (UK Medical Eligibility Criteria) and contraceptive needs.

All patients may be offered a long-acting reversible contraceptive as a first-line contraceptive option given their high efficacy, unless there are specific contraindications.

Contraceptive consultations are an opportunity to identify and manage other sexual health concerns such as screening for sexually transmitted infections, urogenital and gynaecological conditions, or sexual dysfunction.

Where appropriate, consider screening for domestic violence and reproductive coercion.

Arranging follow-up after starting contraception (e.g. after 3 months) can allow for monitoring of adverse effects, education on the chosen method, and adjustment of the method if needed.


 

Managing adverse effects

Adverse effects can impact on a person’s wellbeing and the likelihood of continuing their chosen contraceptive method. LARC users are 3 times more likely to continue their contraceptive method compared with non-LARC users.30 In a large study, LARC continuation rates at 3 years were almost 70% compared with 31% for non-LARCs, with non-LARC users commonly discontinuing their contraception due to adverse effects. LARC users have been found to discontinue use due to irregular bleeding patterns and perceived feelings of decreased wellbeing.30

Counselling on adverse effects prior to starting a contraceptive and on review is an important part of providing contraceptive care. Evidence suggests that more intensive counselling may be associated with a decreased rate of discontinuation of short-acting contraceptives due to adverse effects.31 Common adverse effects and possible management strategies for LARCs and combined oral contraceptive pills can be found in Table 4.

Table 4 Managing common adverse effects of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods and combined oral contraceptive pills [NB1]11,14,32,33

Adverse effect Management strategies
Long-acting reversible contraceptive method (intrauterine devices and contraceptive implant)

Problematic bleeding

Ensure adequate counselling on expected bleeding patterns before use.

Clinical assessment and investigation (e.g. pregnancy test, cervical screening, testing for sexually transmitted infections, pelvic ultrasound) may be warranted to exclude underlying pathology. If no alternative cause of bleeding detected, provide education and reassurance.

If bleeding frequent or prolonged, consider:

  • addition of a combined oral contraceptive pill for 3 months (continuous or cyclical) if medically eligible (refer to UK Medical Eligibility Criteria)
  • a 5-day course of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or tranexamic acid if bleeding is heavy.

Other management strategies such as adding norethisterone or a progestogen-only pill have been suggested; however, evidence is currently limited.

Hormonal adverse effects (e.g. headaches, mood changes, weight gain, breast tenderness, loss of libido)

Review and manage any potential contributing lifestyle causes or factors.

If symptoms are persistent and/or bothersome, consider alternative contraception.

Combined oral contraceptive pills

Nausea

Exclude pregnancy.

Reduce estrogen dose.

Take pills at night.

Change to progestogen-only method.

Breast tenderness

Reduce estrogen and/or progestogen dose.

Change progestogen – consider using a pill containing drospirenone (mild diuretic effect).

Headache

Reduce estrogen dose and/or change progestogen.

If headache occurs in hormone-free week, consider one of the following:

  • extend use of active tablets
  • give 50 micrograms estradiol transdermal patch in this week
  • try estradiol valerate + dienogest pill.

Dysmenorrhoea

Extend pill regimen to reduce the frequency of bleeding.

Decreased libido

No evidence supports a benefit of one type of oral contraceptive pill over another.

Breakthrough bleeding

If taking an ethinylestradiol 20‑microgram pill, increase estrogen dose to a maximum of 35 micrograms.

Change progestogen if already taking an ethinylestradiol 30 to 35‑microgram pill.

Consider alternative forms of contraception.

Mood changes

Seek medical review and assessment if new or worsening mood symptoms.

Address other causes.

Consider extended use or switching to a drospirenone regimen, particularly if symptoms premenstrual.

Weight gain

A causal association between combined hormonal contraception and weight gain has not been found.

Identify and manage potential alternative causes.

NB1: Adapted from reference 33
 

Drug interactions and hormonal contraception

The most important drug interactions affecting hormonal contraception involve drugs that induce hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes. Some examples include:

  • antiepileptic drugs (e.g. barbiturates, primidone, phenytoin, carbamazepine)
  • tuberculosis medications (e.g. rifampicin, rifabutin)
  • antiretroviral drugs for human immunodeficiency virus (e.g. ritonavir, efavirenz)
  • antifungal drugs (e.g. griseofulvin).34

These drugs increase clearance of hormonal contraceptives and can reduce the effectiveness of all combined hormonal contraceptive methods, all progestogen-only pills, and the contraceptive implant.

Caution is advised with the use of hormonal contraceptives and antibiotics if the antibiotics are enzyme inducers (e.g. rifampicin, rifabutin) or the antibiotic (or the illness being treated) causes vomiting or diarrhoea.

The copper and hormonal IUDs are unaffected by liver enzyme–inducing drugs and are the preferred method where drug interactions are an issue.

 

Venous thromboembolism risk

Combined hormonal contraceptives are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) (3 to 15/10,000 woman-years in users versus 1 to 5/10,000 in non-users).35 This risk is still lower than the risk in pregnancy and appears to decline over time. The risk of VTE is significantly higher with pills containing 50 micrograms ethinylestradiol plus levonorgestrel compared with pills containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol.

Naturally based estrogens like estradiol valerate and estetrol have fewer VTE events reported.36,37

People with Factor V Leiden and other inheritable thrombophilias should not use combined hormonal contraceptives. For the combined oral contraceptive pill, the risk varies with the type of progestogen and is lowest in preparations containing progestogens such as levonorgestrel, and highest in pills such as desogestrel.

Progestogen in lower doses, as contained in the implant, pills and IUDs, do not increase the risk of VTE.38

 

Key contraceptive considerations for different population groups13,29,39-42

The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the UK Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare have comprehensive guidelines for contraceptive use in specific population groups. When used in conjunction with UKMEC, these guidelines can assist in selecting appropriate contraception. Key contraceptive considerations for selected population groups are summarised below.

Postpartum39

Contraception should be initiated as soon as possible postpartum, as pregnancy can occur as early as 21 days after birth. Provision of postpartum contraception can optimise interpregnancy interval, as an interpregnancy interval of less than 12 months is associated with an increased risk of preterm birth, low birth weight and small-for-gestational-age babies.39 Antenatal contraceptive counselling can facilitate timely provision of the woman’s chosen method.

Not all contraceptive methods can be started early postpartum. Estrogen-containing contraception such as the combined oral contraceptive pill cannot be used immediately postpartum due to an increased risk of VTE. The timing of commencement depends on a range of factors including breastfeeding status. Practitioners should refer to the UKMEC, which provides detailed and specific guidance.29

The contraceptive implant, progestogen-only pill and contraceptive injection can be started at any time after birth. The hormonal IUDs may be inserted up to 48 hours after uncomplicated caesarean section or vaginal birth, otherwise at least 28 days after delivery (because of risk of perforation between 48 hours and 28 days after delivery). The risk of IUD expulsion is higher if inserted immediately after delivery; however, immediate insertion is associated with high continuation rates and a reduced risk of unintended pregnancy.

Progestogen-only methods of contraception can all be safely used in breastfeeding.

Post-abortion13,39

Contraception can be provided at the time of, or immediately after, an abortion unless medical contraindications exist.39

Copper and hormonal IUDs can be inserted at the time of surgical abortion at any gestation.43-45 They can be inserted after a medical abortion once expulsion of the products of conception has been confirmed, and post-abortion infection has been excluded.

Progestogen-only contraceptives can be initiated at any time following medical or surgical abortion. The contraceptive implant may be inserted at the time of prescribing or taking mifepristone. Administration of the contraceptive injection at the time of mifepristone administration has a slightly higher risk of continuing pregnancy and patients should be adequately counselled on the signs and symptoms of a failed abortion.

Combined hormonal contraception can be started at any time following an abortion.

Patients should be counselled that additional contraceptive precautions are required if contraception is initiated more than 5 days after an abortion.

Young people40

Providers of contraception should assess the individual’s ability to provide consent using frameworks such as the Fraser guidelines or Gillick competence,46,47 consider the possibility of exploitation and coercion, and be aware of local mandatory reporting requirements. Young people should be informed of confidentiality and the limitations of this.

The high efficacy, reliability and ‘set and forget’ nature of LARCs may be attractive to young people. However, the need to see a healthcare professional and have a procedure to insert LARCs may be a barrier to their use.

The non-contraceptive benefits of the combined oral contraceptive pill, including improvement in symptoms of primary dysmenorrhoea and acne, may benefit young people affected by these conditions.

Given the potential for delay in return to fertility and potential decrease in bone mineral density associated with the contraceptive injection, alternative methods are preferred for those aged 18 years and under.

Women aged over 40 years41

Effective contraception until menopause is required to prevent unintended pregnancy. Medical eligibility (UKMEC) should be carefully examined for each patient, as many women over 40 have elevated background risks of cardiovascular disease, VTE, and other comorbidities.

The contraceptive implant and progestogen-only pill can be safely used in women over 40, with no associated increased risk of VTE, stroke, myocardial infarction, or bone mineral density effect.

The 52 mg levonorgestrel IUD (Mirena) can be used for contraception until menopause or age 55 if inserted at age 45 or over, provided it is not being used for endometrial protection with menopausal hormone therapy (Table 1). The copper IUD can be used until menopause when inserted in women aged over 40 years.

Women over 40 using the contraceptive injection should be reviewed regularly to assess the risks and benefits in relation to bone mineral density. Women over 50 should use an alternative method.

The combined oral contraceptive pill may be used in women over 40 if they are medically eligible; however, women over 50 should use an alternative method. If the combined oral contraceptive pill is the chosen method in a woman over 40, consider prescribing pills containing a lower dose of estrogen (30 micrograms ethinylestradiol or less) and with levonorgestrel or norethisterone progestogen components, given their potentially lower risk of VTE, cardiovascular disease and stroke.

The potential non-contraceptive benefits of some contraceptives may be relevant to women in this age group. For example, the hormonal IUD may be used to manage heavy periods common in perimenopause, or the combined oral contraceptive pill may be used in medically eligible women to relieve the symptoms of menopause and prevent loss of bone mineral density.

People with obesity42

While evidence suggests that body mass index (BMI) does not affect contraceptive efficacy (excluding that of emergency contraception), BMI may affect medical eligibility for certain contraceptive methods.

Estrogen-containing contraceptives are not recommended for women with a BMI of 35 kg/m2 or greater. In women with a BMI of 30 kg/m2 or greater, the use of the contraceptive injection has been associated with increased weight gain. A longer length needle may be required to administer intramuscular injections in women with obesity.

Women using weight loss medications that may cause diarrhoea or vomiting may experience reduced effectiveness of oral contraceptives. Women who have undergone weight loss surgery are recommended to use non-oral contraceptive methods given the potential issues with absorption.

People with migraine

Estrogen-containing contraceptives are contraindicated in individuals who experience migraine with aura. In those with a history (of at least 5 years) of migraine with aura or who develop a migraine without aura while using these methods, the use of the combined oral contraceptive pill or the vaginal ring is not recommended. Non-hormonal contraception such as the copper IUD, or any of the progestogen-only methods can be used by people experiencing migraine.29

 

Improving access to contraception in Australia

A variety of strategies has been implemented and proposed to improve access to contraception in Australia, including:

  • patients’ ability to access a resupply of their prescribed oral contraceptive pill through community pharmacist dispensing. This exists in most areas of Australia, with variable conditions and dispensing laws between jurisdictions. Studies overseas have demonstrated increased contraception uptake with access to contraception through pharmacies,48 and a recent Australian study found the idea was generally favourable, with women emphasising the need for safe and private delivery of care through pharmacies49
  • building workforce capacity by increasing training opportunities in LARC insertion and removal for practitioners,50 as well as enhancing the ability of nurse practitioners, registered nurses and midwives to prescribe, insert and remove contraceptive devices.51 Large trials are underway in Australia to further investigate nurse-led models of care for providing contraception, particularly in rural and regional areas52
  • adjustment of the Medicare Benefit Schedule to increase rebates for LARC-related services, and expand item numbers for nurse practitioners, nurses and midwives providing contraceptive care50
  • clear referral pathways for LARC insertion and removal. While some states provide referral sites, such as Children By Choice (Queensland) and 1800 My Options (Victoria), this is not uniform across Australia and practitioners should be aware of local options for referral
  • professional networks such as The Australian Contraception and Abortion Primary Care Practitioner Support Network, which provide primary care practitioners with further support, education and training.
 

Conclusion

LARCs are the most effective methods of contraception. Contraception prescribing should be guided by the individual’s medical eligibility and other factors such as reproductive life stage, drug interactions, reversibility and lifestyle. Education on the range of contraceptive options including a discussion around the risks and benefits of each method can empower individuals to choose their preferred contraceptive. Encouraging follow-up can offer the opportunity for managing adverse effects and providing ongoing sexual and reproductive health care. It is good practice to regularly reassess each woman’s contraceptive needs and medical eligibility as this will change over time.

This article was finalised on 13 May 2025.

Conflicts of interest: Emma Mason received funding from ASHM Health for conference attendance in 2024.

Kirsten Black is an investigator within the Centre of Research Excellence in Sexual and Reproductive Health for Women in Primary Care which is funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council. Kirsten has received research funding from the Women’s Plans Foundation, Department of Health and Aged Care, and the Medical Research Future Fund. Kirsten is the Chair of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists’ Special Interest Group in Sexual and Reproductive Health.

This article is peer reviewed.

 

Australian Prescriber welcomes Feedback.

 

References

  1. Richters J, Fitzadam S, Yeung A, Caruana T, Rissel C, Simpson JM, et al. Contraceptive practices among women: the second Australian study of health and relationships. Contraception 2016;94:548-55.
  2. Family Planning NSW. Contraception in Australia 2005-2018. 2020. [cited 2025 May 13]
  3. Grzeskowiak LE, Calabretto H, Amos N, Mazza D, Ilomaki J. Changes in use of hormonal long-acting reversible contraceptive methods in Australia between 2006 and 2018: A population-based study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2021;61:128-34.
  4. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division. Trends in Contraceptive Use Worldwide 2015. United Nations; 2015. [cited 2025 May 13]
  5. Hellström A, Gemzell Danielsson K, Kopp Kallner H. Trends in use and attitudes towards contraception in Sweden: results of a nationwide survey. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2019;24:154-60.
  6. Rowe H, Holton S, Kirkman M, Bayly C, Jordan L, McNamee K, et al. Prevalence and distribution of unintended pregnancy: the Understanding Fertility Management in Australia National Survey. Aust N Z J Public Health 2016;40:104-9.
  7. Taft AJ, Shankar M, Black KI, Mazza D, Hussainy S, Lucke JC. Unintended and unwanted pregnancy in Australia: a cross-sectional, national random telephone survey of prevalence and outcomes. Med J Aust 2018;209:407-8.
  8. Nelson HD, Darney BG, Ahrens K, Burgess A, Jungbauer RM, Cantor A, et al. Associations of Unintended Pregnancy With Maternal and Infant Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA 2022;328:1714-29.
  9. Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Buckel C, Madden T, Allsworth JE, et al. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1998-2007.
  10. McNicholas C, Madden T, Secura G, Peipert JF. The contraceptive CHOICE project round up: what we did and what we learned. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2014;57:635-43.
  11. Intrauterine contraceptive devices. In: Therapeutic Guidelines. Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited; 2023. [cited 2024 Nov 3]
  12. Clinical Effectiveness Unit. FSRH Guideline Intrauterine Contraception. Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare; 2023. [cited 2025 May 13]
  13. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. C-Gyn 3 Contraception Clinical Guideline (Signposting). 2024. [cited 2025 May 13]
  14. Etonorgestrel contraceptive implant. In: Therapeutic Guidelines. Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited; 2023. [cited 2025 May 13]
  15. Jensen JT, Reinecke I, Lukkari-Lax E, Hofmann BM. Estimating In Vivo Levonorgestrel Release Rate and Exposure Over Eight Years With Levonorgestrel Releasing Intrauterine System 52 mg Use With Population Pharmacokinetic Approach [A03]. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2022;139:1S.
  16. Gemzell-Danielsson K, Schellschmidt I, Apter D. A randomized, phase II study describing the efficacy, bleeding profile, and safety of two low-dose levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive systems and Mirena. Fertil Steril 2012;97:616-22 e1-3.
  17. Therapeutic Goods Administration. Mirena (levonorgestrel) Intrauterine Device: Australian Prescription Medicine Summary. Department of Health and Aged Care; 2024. [cited 2024 Oct 21]
  18. Jensen JT, Lukkari-Lax E, Schulze A, Wahdan Y, Serrani M, Kroll R. Contraceptive efficacy and safety of the 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system for up to 8 years: findings from the Mirena Extension Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;227:873 e1- e12.
  19. Family Planning Alliance Australia. Extended use of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. 2024. [cited 2025 May 13]
  20. Clinical Effectiveness Unit. FSRH Guideline Progestogen-only pills. Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare; 2022. [cited 2025 May 13]
  21. Clinical Effectiveness Unit. Progestogen-only Injectable Contraception. Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare; 2014. [cited 2025 Apr 30]
  22. Family Planning Alliance Australia. How effective is my contraceptive method? Factsheet. 2024. [cited 2025 May 13]
  23. Foidart JM, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Kubba A, Douxfils J, Creinin MD, Gaspard U. The benefits of estetrol addition to drospirenone for contraception. AJOG Glob Rep 2023;3:100266.
  24. MIMS Australia. [cited 2025 May 13]
  25. NPS Medicinewise. Consumer Medicine Information. Slinda (Drosperinone). 2021. [cited 2025 May 13]
  26. Committee Opinion No. 602: Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and bone effects. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:1398-402.
  27. Pardthaisong T, Gray RH, McDaniel EB. Return of fertility after discontinuation of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and intra-uterine devices in Northern Thailand. Lancet 1980;1:509-12.
  28. Choice of Contraceptive Method. In: Therapeutic Guidelines. Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited; 2023. [cited 2024 Oct 21]
  29. Clinical Effectiveness Unit. UK Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (UKMEC). Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare; 2019. [cited 2025 May 13]
  30. Diedrich JT, Zhao Q, Madden T, Secura GM, Peipert JF. Three-year continuation of reversible contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213:662 e1-8.
  31. Mack N, Crawford TJ, Guise JM, Chen M, Grey TW, Feldblum PJ, et al. Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter-term hormonal methods of contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;4:CD004317.
  32. Clinical Effectiveness Unit. FSRH Guideline Problematic Bleeding With Hormonal Contraception. Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare; 2015. [cited 2025 May 13]
  33. Stewart M, Black K. Choosing a combined oral contraceptive pill. Aust Prescr 2015;38:6-11.
  34. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Levonorgestrel-containing emergency hormonal contraception: advice on interactions with hepatic enzyme inducers and contraceptive efficacy. UK Department of Health and Social Care; 2016. [cited 2025 May 13]
  35. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Combined hormonal contraception and the risk of venous thromboembolism: a guideline. Fertil Steril 2017;107:43-51.
  36. Didembourg M, Locquet M, Raskin L, Tchimchoua BT, Dogne JM, Beaudart C, et al. Lower reporting of venous thromboembolisms events with natural estrogen-based combined oral contraceptives compared to ethinylestradiol-containing pills: A disproportionality analysis of the Eudravigilance database. Contraception 2025;142:110727.
  37. Morimont L, Jost M, Gaspard U, Foidart JM, Dogne JM, Douxfils J. Low Thrombin Generation in Users of a Contraceptive Containing Estetrol and Drospirenone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2022;108:135-43.
  38. Cockrum RH, Soo J, Ham SA, Cohen KS, Snow SG. Association of Progestogens and Venous Thromboembolism Among Women of Reproductive Age. Obstet Gynecol 2022;140:477-87.
  39. Clinical Effectiveness Unit. FSRH Guideline Contraception After Pregnancy. Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare; 2020. [cited 2025 May 13]
  40. Clinical Effectiveness Unit. FSRH Guideline Contraceptive Choices for Young People. Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare; 2019. [cited 2025 May 13]
  41. Clinical Effectiveness Unit. FSRH Guideline Contraception for Women Over 40 Years. Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare; 2023. [cited 2025 May 13]
  42. Clinical Effectiveness Unit. FSRH Guideline Overweight, Obesity and Contraception. Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare; 2019. [cited 2025 May 13]
  43. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The care of women requesting induced abortion. Evidence-based Clinical Guideline No 7. 2011. [cited 2025 Apr 30]
  44. Ipas. Clinical Updates in Reproductive Health. Chapel Hill, NC: Ipas; 2023. [cited 2025 May 13]
  45. Gemzell-Danielsson K, Kopp Kallner H, Faundes A. Contraception following abortion and the treatment of incomplete abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014;126 Suppl 1:S52-5.
  46. Brahams D. House of Lords rules DHSS guidance on contraception lawful. Lancet 1985;2:959-60.
  47. Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Health Authority.  AC 112; 1986.
  48. Cameron ST, Glasier A, McDaid L, Radley A, Patterson S, Baraitser P, et al. Provision of the progestogen-only pill by community pharmacies as bridging contraception for women receiving emergency contraception: the Bridge-it RCT. Health Technol Assess 2021;25:1-92.
  49. Dev T, Buckingham P, Mazza D. Women's perspectives of direct pharmacy access to oral contraception. Aust J Prim Health 2023;29:235-43.
  50. Parliament of Australia. Australian Government response to the Senate Community Affairs References Committee report: Ending the postcode lottery – Addressing barriers to sexual, maternity and reproductive healthcare in Australia. 2025. [cited 2025 May 13]
  51. Parliament of Australia. Chapter 2 – Enhancing access to contraceptives. In: Ending the postcode lottery: Addressing barriers to sexual, maternity and reproductive healthcare in Australia. 2023.
  52. Mazza D, Shankar M, Botfield JR, Moulton JE, Chakraborty SP, Black K, et al. Improving rural and regional access to long-acting reversible contraception and medical abortion through nurse-led models of care, task-sharing and telehealth (ORIENT): a protocol for a stepped-wedge pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial in Australian general practice. BMJ Open 2023;13:e065137.
 

Emma Mason

Lecturer in Sexual and Reproductive Health, The University of Sydney

Kirsten Black

Professor of Sexual and Reproductive Health, The University of Sydney