Letter
Thank you for your insightful article on
aminoglycosides.1 I noted with interest the
recommendation to use the Cockcroft–Gault equation, with different weight
descriptors depending on body mass index, for calculating aminoglycoside doses
in relation to kidney function, citing a paper by Winter et al.2 However, another paper cited in the
article (Pai et al.)3 suggests improved prediction of aminoglycoside clearance using estimated
glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) rather than estimated creatinine clearance.
Similarly, Lim et al.4 found that the CKD-EPI (Chronic
Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) equation adjusted for body surface
area best predicts aminoglycoside clearance.
I would be interested in your thoughts on
reconciling these differing approaches.
Janice Chiang
Antimicrobial Stewardship Pharmacist, Barwon Health, Geelong
Conflicts of interest: none declared
Australian Prescriber welcomes Feedback.
- Moore H, Yeoh D, Hughes C, Raby E,
Sandaradura I. Aminoglycosides: an update on indications, dosing and
monitoring. Australian Prescriber 2025;48:133-8.
- Winter MA, Guhr KN, Berg GM. Impact of
various body weights and serum creatinine concentrations on the bias and
accuracy of the Cockcroft-Gault equation. Pharmacotherapy 2012;32:604-12.
- Pai MP, Nafziger AN, Bertino JS, Jr.
Simplified estimation of aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics in underweight and
obese adult patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011;55:4006-11.
- Lim AK, Mathanasenarajah G, Larmour I.
Assessment of aminoglycoside dosing and estimated glomerular filtration rate in
determining gentamicin and tobramycin area under the curve and clearance.
Intern Med J 2015;45:319-29.
Author's response
Indy Sandaradura, one of the authors of the article, comments:
Thank you for your letter. We acknowledge the uncertainty in
determining the optimal approach for aminoglycoside dosing. As you rightly
pointed out, different equations such as the Cockcroft–Gault equation, eGFR and
CKD-EPI have been recommended in various studies, each with its own merits and
limitations. This variability underscores the need for a consistent approach to
dosing that considers kidney function.
The recommendation to use Cockcroft–Gault in Therapeutic
Guidelines: Antibiotic was primarily to ensure consistency across the
guideline and with other external guidelines. Additionally, using
Cockcroft–Gault to estimate creatinine clearance requires adjustment for body
size, which is often forgotten when using eGFR, which is indexed to a body
surface area of 1.73 m2.
In practice, we emphasise the importance of early consultation
and therapeutic drug monitoring for patients with challenging clinical
scenarios. This approach helps to tailor the dosage regimen to the individual
patient's needs, ensuring both efficacy and safety. We believe that maintaining
a consistent methodology for dosing, while being open to adjustments based on therapeutic
drug monitoring and clinical judgement, is crucial for optimal patient
outcomes.
The Editorial Advisory Committee
welcomes letters, which should be less than 250 words. Before a decision to
publish is made, letters which refer to a published article may be sent to the
author for a response. Any letter may be sent to an expert for comment. When
letters are published, they are usually accompanied in the same issue by any
responses or comments. The Committee screens out discourteous, inaccurate or
libellous statements. The letters are subedited before publication. Authors are
required to declare any conflicts of interest. The Committee's decision on
publication is final.