New drug
Vutrisiran for transthyretin amyloidosis
- Aust Prescr 2026;49:39-41
- 10 February 2026
- DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2026.001
Background:
Hereditary transthyretin
amyloidosis (hATTR, also known as ATTRv) is a rare, autosomal dominant, multisystem
condition caused by mutations or variants in the transthyretin (TTR)
gene. TTR is a protein
predominantly produced in the liver that transports thyroxine and retinol-binding
proteins, so affects serum vitamin A concentration. Genetic variants in
the TTR gene result in misfolding of the TTR protein, destabilising the
structure, and ultimately resulting in the formation of abnormal, insoluble
amyloid fibrils. These amyloid fibrils deposit throughout the body,
predominantly in extracellular tissue, leading to multisystem disease, debilitating morbidity and
high mortality.1,2 Whilst the peripheral
nervous system and heart are most commonly affected, organ involvement may
include the kidney, eyes, central nervous and gastrointestinal systems; hence, clinical
presentation is widely variable.1,2
The current approval is only for adults with polyneuropathy due to hATTR and a proven genetic variant; either stage 1 (unimpaired ambulation; mild sensory, motor and autonomic lower limb neuropathy) or stage 2 (assistance with ambulation required; moderate impairment of the lower limbs, upper limbs and trunk).2 Patisiran was approved in 2022 for the same indication as vutrisiran and is in the same class of drugs.3 Vutrisiran acts via a similar mechanism of action to patisiran but has increased stability and tolerability, and therefore requires smaller doses with a longer dosing interval.
Mechanism
of action:
Vutrisiran
is a TTR gene silencer; one of a group of drugs that acts via
small RNA-interfering agents to reduce production of the TTR protein in the
liver, and therefore amyloid fibril production and disease progression.2,4
Clinical trials:
Vutrisiran was
approved for treatment of hATTR in adults with stage 1 or stage 2
polyneuropathy based on outcomes from the HELIOS-A trial – a global, open-label,
randomised study comparing vutrisiran to patisiran and an external placebo
group (77 patients from the APOLLO phase 3 double-blind, randomised trial
that compared patisiran with placebo in a similar population of patients with
hATTR polyneuropathy).5 Patients were randomised 3:1 to
receive 25 mg of vutrisiran (n=122) subcutaneously every 3 months, or
0.3 mg/kg of patisiran (n=42) intravenously every 3 weeks over 18 months.
All patients received vitamin A supplementation of 2500 international
units daily. Ninety-seven percent of participants completed 18 months of
treatment. The median patient age at baseline of those who received vutrisiran was
60 years (range 34 to 80 years), 38% were 65 years or older,
and 65% of patients were male.
The primary endpoint was a change from baseline to month 18 in the modified Neuropathy Impairment Score +7 (mNIS+7). The mNIS+7 is a composite measure of motor, sensory and autonomic neuropathy that includes motor strength, reflexes, quantitative sensory testing, nerve conduction studies and postural blood pressure, with the score ranging from 0 to 304 points, where an increasing score indicates worsening impairment.
Secondary endpoints included change from baseline to month 18 in the Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (QoL‑DN) total score, gait speed (10-meter walk test [10‑MWT]), nutritional status (modified BMI), and patient-reported ability to perform activities of daily living and social participation (Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale [R‑ODS]). The range of endpoints reflect the wide-ranging disease burden of hATTR. Serum TTR concentrations were reduced in less than 3 weeks and sustained at 18 months, with 87.6% and 81% reduction in vutrisiran and patisiran groups respectively.
Vutrisiran was assessed as noninferior to patisiran. Compared with placebo, treatment with vutrisiran demonstrated statistically significant improvement from baseline to month 9 (mNIS+7, QoL‑DN and 10‑MWT) and month 18 (all endpoints) (Table 1). In addition, approximately half of patients demonstrated reversal in some manifestations of disease.6
Table 1 Percentage of patients with improvement in mNIS+7 and QoL‑DN after 9 months and after 18 months of vutrisiran treatment compared with placebo6
| Duration of treatment | ||||
| 9 months | 18 months | |||
|
Placebo |
Vutrisiran |
Placebo |
Vutrisiran |
|
|
mNIS+7 |
18.2% |
50.4% |
3.9% |
48.3% |
|
QoL‑DN |
23.4% |
53.4% |
10.4% |
56.8% |
| mNIS+7 = modified Neuropathy Impairment Score +7; QoL‑DN = Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy score | ||||
Adverse effects:
Although most patients (97.5%) in the
vutrisiran group reported adverse events, the majority were mild or moderate in
severity, and most were consistent with the underlying disease. Adverse events
occurring in 10% or more of patients were falls, pain in extremity, diarrhoea, peripheral
oedema, urinary tract infection, arthralgia and dizziness, with all except pain
in extremity and arthralgia occurring at a similar or lower rate than in the
external placebo group. Five patients (4.1%) reported mild and transient
reactions at the injection site. There were 2 deaths in the vutrisiran group
and 3 in the patisiran group, with none being considered drug-related.6
Dosage and administration:
The dosage of vutrisiran is 25 mg
administered via subcutaneous injection every 3 months by a health
professional.7
Premedication is not required. Vutrisiran must be prescribed by, or in
consultation with, an amyloid expert. Delivery is typically initially at an
amyloid specialist service but, once established on therapy, may be performed
by a general practitioner or local health service.
No dose adjustment is required for patients aged 65 years or older, with mild hepatic impairment, or with moderate renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate over 30 mL/min/1.73 m2).
There are no data for use in patients younger than 18 years.7
Precautions:
Vutrisiran use can lead to vitamin A
deficiency, due to reduced circulating concentration of TTR, reducing serum
retinol. Vitamin A deficiency should be corrected prior to starting vutrisiran,
and vitamin A supplements are required while on treatment.7
Serum monitoring of vitamin A is not accurate while on vutrisiran as
alternative transport and storage mechanisms can occur in the absence of
retinol-binding TTR.7
Ophthalmological assessment at baseline and yearly is recommended.
Vutrisiran has not been studied in the context of hepatic or renal impairment,7 although no ocular, hepatic or renal safety concerns have been reported in pooled safety data.8
Use in pregnancy and breastfeeding:
Vutrisiran is classified as Therapeutic Goods Administration pregnancy category D and should not be used in pregnancy, mainly because of known
teratogenicity of vitamin A levels that are either too high or too low. Pregnancy
should be excluded prior to starting vutrisiran and avoided while on treatment.
If pregnancy is planned, vutrisiran and vitamin A supplementation should
be stopped. Vitamin A should be monitored and confirmed as normal prior to
conception.
It is not known whether vutrisiran is excreted in human milk and breastfeeding is not recommended.7
Place in therapy:
Vutrisiran is effective in preventing
progression of disease in patients with polyneuropathy due to hATTR. Vutrisiran
is first-line therapy for patients with hATTR and evidence of polyneuropathy
with or without concurrent cardiomyopathy. Vutrisiran will replace patisiran,
as it was demonstrated in trial to be noninferior, and has better tolerability
and a more favourable dosing regimen. Patisiran will be
withdrawn from the Australian market and patients currently treated with
partisiran will transition to vutrisiran.
Practice points:
Treatment with
vutrisiran should be started and monitored by an hATTR specialist service and vitamin A
supplementation is required while on treatment.
This new drug comment was finalised on 13 January 2026. It was prepared by Mary Belfrage, Clinical Editor, Australian Prescriber, and reviewed by Natasha Gorrie, Cardiologist, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney and PhD candidate, Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Sydney.
At the time this new drug comment was prepared, the Australian Public Assessment Report was available from the Therapeutic Goods Administration. The sponsor did not provide the Clinical Evaluation Report.
This article is peer reviewed.
Australian Prescriber welcomes Feedback.
The new drug comments in Australian Prescriber are prepared by the editors and reviewed by the subject matter experts. Some of the views expressed on newly approved products should be regarded as preliminary, as there may be limited published data at the time of publication, and little experience in Australia of their safety or efficacy. Before new drugs are prescribed, it is important that more detailed information is obtained from the approved product information, a medicines information centre or some other appropriate source.
Report all suspected adverse reactions to new drugs to enable continued monitoring of their benefit–harm balance.